GEO AUDIT · $3,500 · 7 DAYS
DWG 01 / 09 · DIAGNOSTIC

A buyer just asked AI who to consider.
You were not in the answer.

A seven-day diagnostic of whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and Google AI Mode name you when a buyer asks your category. You get a competitor benchmark, a prioritized list of fixes to pages you already publish, and a 30-minute walkthrough.

Right now a buyer is asking AI who to consider in your category, and the answer names three companies. You find out later whether you were one of them.

Three names come back. You are in the answer or you are not.

A buyer asks ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini who to consider, and the model writes back one answer with a few vendors named in it. There is no second page to scroll to and no rank to climb. You are in that answer or you are invisible for that buyer, and you never see the query that left you out.

This is already how most B2B research starts.

51% of B2B software buyers now start research with an AI assistant more often than Google, up from 29% a year ago. 69% chose a different vendor than they had planned based on what the assistant said, and one-third bought from a company they had never heard of before (G2, 2026). The shortlist is forming inside the model, whether or not you are in the room.

The authority you already paid for is not reaching the answer.

You already paid for the content, the case studies, and the earned coverage that should make the model name you. It is not reaching the answer on its own, the way an SEO audit once told you where you ranked. The 7-day GEO audit runs your category live across all six systems, shows you where you stand against the three names buyers are hearing, and hands you a prioritized list of fixes to pages you already publish. $3,500 fixed. Send a URL and a sentence about what you sell and to whom.

AFTER · GEO ANSWER VIEW

AI Search gives you just one paragraph. Three vendors.

A GEO audit tells you whether you show up at all when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini about your category, and which three names the AI picked instead.

SECTION B · METHOD · FIG. 02

Six layers of visibility.
Every one tied to whether AI recommends you.

Each layer produces a 1-to-5 score, a plain-English finding, and a fix list ordered by impact and effort. Read top to bottom: the lower the layer, the harder it is to fix, the more it compounds.

GRADE
01
AI Crawler Access
02
Structured Data
03
Content Extractability
04
Brand & Entity Authority
05
Live LLM Visibility Test
06
Fan-Out Query Footprint
DEPTH
01
LAYER · AI CRAWLER ACCESS

Can AI systems physically reach and parse your site?

In the sites I have audited, roughly 68% of enterprise B2B sites accidentally block at least one major AI crawler through robots.txt, Cloudflare or CDN rules, or server-side rendering issues.

AI runs two crawler types. Training crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended) feed the models. Retrieval crawlers (OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot) fetch pages live when a buyer’s question triggers a search, and those decide whether you can be cited.

A CDN rule or a client-rendered page can block the retrieval crawlers silently. This layer tests both, and it usually produces the fastest wins. 

If GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot can’t reach your pages, nothing else in this audit matters.

~68% of B2B sites block at least one AI crawler
02
LAYER · STRUCTURED DATA

Does your site tell AI unambiguously what you are?

Schema markup, entity signals, sameAs links, Organization and Service schema, FAQPage markup, Person schema on team pages. Generic, partially-filled schema can perform worse for AI citation than no schema at all, because it sends mixed signals about what your entity is. Most sites have exactly that.
–18 pp citation penalty for partial schema
03
LAYER · CONTENT EXTRACTABILITY

Can LLMs pull clean, citable answers from your pages?

Answer-first paragraph structure, heading hierarchy, FAQ blocks, scannable prose, last-updated timestamps, alt text completeness. This is where twenty years of information architecture applies directly: most SEO consultants audit content for keyword density. This audit evaluates extractability and clarity.
04
LAYER · BRAND & ENTITY AUTHORITY

Does the AI ecosystem recognize you as a legitimate entity?

Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crunchbase, G2, Reddit, industry publications, founder LinkedIn presence, author expertise signals. Branded search volume and third-party mentions correlate more strongly with AI citation than backlinks do. This is the layer hardest to fix quickly, which makes finding gaps here genuinely valuable.
05
LAYER · LIVE LLM VISIBILITY TEST

When real buyers ask AI about your category, do you show up?

15-to-20 buyer-intent prompts developed specifically for your ICP, run live across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Mode. Every response documented with screenshots. Brand mentions counted, sentiment logged, accuracy checked, competitor appearances tracked. This is the layer clients care about most emotionally: it makes the invisible visible.
15–20 prompts · 5 AI systems · screenshots archived
06
LAYER · FAN-OUT QUERY FOOTPRINT

Is your site already in AI retrieval traffic, even without clicks?

Fan-out queries are the long, boolean-operator-heavy sub-queries AI systems generate when decomposing a user question. They appear in Google Search Console but most teams don’t know what they are. Finding them is genuinely valuable intel: it proves or disproves that AI systems are already retrieving from your site.

Send a URL and a quick sentence.

Send a short email with your URL and two or three competitor URLs. First deliverable lands seven days later. Fit assessment and kickoff date come back within 24 hours.

FIX-LIST TRIAGE · ORDERED BY IMPACT

Every finding tagged by effort.

Typical audit produces 20–40 findings. The list arrives already triaged so your team knows what to ship Monday vs. what to plan.

INSIDE THE CUT

When you want a deeper engagement:

DELIVERABLE 01 · PDF

A 15-to-20 page audit report.

  • Executive summary.
  • Six-dimension findings with screenshots and analytics evidence.
  • Prioritized fix list tagged Quick Win, Medium, Strategic.
  • 30-day action plan.
DELIVERABLE 02 · MP4

A 30-minute video walkthrough.

Recorded personally, narrating the report in plain language. Forward it to a developer, an agency, or a skeptical executive without re-explaining anything.

A-06 · PRE-KICKOFF

What usually comes up before the first call.

Nine questions that have come up on every GEO audit intake so far. Short answers. Full ones live in the report.
Q.01
How is a GEO audit different from an SEO audit?

An SEO audit tells you where you rank on Google's ten blue links. A GEO audit tells you whether you show up at all when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini about your category. Complementary, not the same.

Q.02
Do GEO results actually drive revenue, or is this early-stage noise?

Depends on your category. For B2B SaaS with a 60-to-180-day cycle and a research-heavy buyer, AI citations already influence shortlist inclusion measurably. Commodity purchases with short cycles: smaller, later. The audit includes an honest read for your specific category.

Q.03
How long until I see results from implementing the fixes?

Quick Wins typically move indicators within 2–4 weeks. Strategic fixes (entity authority, third-party mentions, content overhauls) compound over 3–6 months. The audit tells you which is which.

Q.04
Should I do a GEO Audit or a CRO Audit first?

If traffic isn't converting, CRO first. If you have decent conversion but suspect AI is recommending competitors instead of you, GEO first. Same price either way. If unsure, send a URL and get a straight answer back.

Q.05
What do you need from me to get started?

Read-only GSC access, a short kickoff call to understand your ICP, and URLs of your two or three most important competitors. If GSC is slow, the audit ships on time with five of six layers; Layer 6 gets added when access clears.

Q.06
Can you implement the fixes after the audit?

Yes, as a separate engagement, scoped after you've seen findings. Clients also frequently take the fix list to their existing developer or SEO team. Both paths are fine.

Q.07
Is $3,500 a lot or a little for this?

Automated GEO scanner tools cost $0 to $49 and produce thin reports. Enterprise agency GEO retainers start at $3,000 a month. This is a senior practitioner running your category live across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, then handing you a scored, prioritized fix list in seven days. Roughly the cost of one trade show badge.

Q.08
What if the audit shows our site is already in great shape?

Short report, a clear "don't spend money on this right now" recommendation, and the 30-day plan becomes a light monitoring cadence. Debrief still happens. You paid for the certainty.

Q.09
What makes this a good fit?

You run marketing or growth at a B2B company doing $2M–$200M in revenue, and you’ve already invested in traffic (SEO, paid, content) and the conversion side hasn’t kept pace. You need a diagnosis you can act on inside a quarter, not a six-month engagement that produces a deck in month three.

A-07 · READY WHEN YOU ARE

Ready to find out what AI is saying about you? Send a URL.

Send a short email with your URL and two or three competitor URLs. First deliverable lands seven days later. Fit assessment and kickoff date come back within 24 hours.

Start a project

Pick what you are starting and where. I will come back with scope and a kickoff date.


    Send a URL

    One page, one sentence. I’ll reply with the first few things I’d fix, usually within a day.